The Seventh Circuit held that there were genuine issues of material fact. A jury could infer that Ford's company doctor was hostile towards Baptist because of a disputed injury to Baptist's wrist where the doctor cleared him to work, even though he claimed that he could not operate a forklift with his injury. Further, the record contained conflicting medical opinions as to Baptist's ability to operate forklift after he incurred injury to his wrist, and Baptist contended that member of management attempted to coerce him into abandoning his workers' compensation claim in exchange for saving his job.