On appeal to the Seventh Circuit, the Court affirmed the judgment except for a provision in the injunction, which was remanded for further proceedings. The Seventh Circuit held:
1. The two jury's verdicts were not inconsistent, because they were considering different time periods.
2. The district court did not abuse its discretion by admitting the EEOC's expert witness, even though the EEOC did not submit his written report under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(2)(B).
3. The medical evidence of the employee's pain supported the $100,000 compensatory damage award.
4. The punitive damage award met the ADA statutory and due-process standards.
EEOC v. AutoZone, Inc., No. 12-1017 (7th Cir. Feb. 15, 2013).