The Seventh Circuit held that the terms of the plan defined disability as the inability to engage for profit any occupation commensurate with plaintiff's education, training and experience, and plaintiff's medical evidence satisfied that definition as the plaintiff's doctors established that she experienced pain and fatigue that precluded her from working regular schedule. Moreover, the plan's doctors who found the plaintiff was not disabled either spent only token amount of time examining the plaintiff or rendered opinions that were not considered by defendant. Also, the defendant failed to indicate what job or kind of job the plaintiff would be capable of performing if it had canceled plaintiff's benefits.