Plaintiff had requested an additional two-month leave of absence beyond what she was entitled to receive. However, the Seventh Circuit held that the plaintiff failed to show that she was "otherwise qualified for her job" because her job required regular attendance at work, and she had failed to present any evidence of the medical likelihood of her recovery to support her request for additional leave. Furthermore, the plaintiff's declaration that she would have been able to return to work on regular basis if she had received an additional leave of absence was insufficient to allow the trier of fact to find a likelihood that she would have returned to work on regular basis, particularly because the record showed that the plaintiff had repeatedly requested additional medical leave when her leave was about to expire.